Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Something that always bugged me

Now that I'm putting a little effort into compiling a list of Hugo eligible works, I am reminded once again of how few people refer to the publisher when mentioning that a book or story has come out.

With some it may be on purpose, with the thought that the publisher is so small, or self, or POD, that maybe mentioning where the work came out will not be a boost. But with the great majority, it's clear that the author and/or reader/reviewer just never considered mentioning who the publisher is.

And it bugs me not only because it makes my list-tabulating that much more difficult, but because there's this inherent assumption that now that the writer<-->reader connection has been made, the channels that made that connection are unimportant. As if the risk, money, support, etc of the publisher are just not important now that the deed is done.

I know darn well that's not what most authors think of their publishers, but it still surprises me when there's no mention of them.


Jan. 11th, 2012 01:50 am (UTC)
See, now was it ironically or un-ironically that you didn't mention the publisher (Pry)?

The other critical point of info, if you want people to be able to nominate the works that you're in support of, is that this is a novel (I looked it up).

Almost no one who lists their short fiction is carefully spelling out what the length of the story is.
Jan. 11th, 2012 01:54 am (UTC)
Nah, just wasn't thinking about it, did a quick post on an impulse.

But yes, it is a novel, rather than a short story -- didn't think of that point, either.


after all
Alice Bentley

Latest Month

September 2017

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com